The table below shows the results of surveys in 2000, 2005 and 2010 about one university.
The table depicts the outcomes of a survey of a university in three different years. The spectacular feature of the chart is a satisfaction of students in 2010 by Electronic gadgets.
At a fleeting glance, it is clearly observed that teaching quality was praised by approximately two-third of individuals in 2000 however at the end of the decade it surged by the 4%. Majority of pupils were delighted with the services of Print resources in all the years. Moreover, 32% students gave positive remarks to the range of modules offered in 2000 whereas this number collapsed by 2% and 3% in the following years.
Moving further, there was a consistency in the ratings of the building and teaching facilities that was 77% in every year. It is interesting to note that only 45% people were glad by the services of electronic resources while this number elevated by 28% after 5 years and again uplifted by 16% in the subsequent years.
All-in-all, a paramount number of people were happier with all the aspects of a university except the range of modules offered.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-15 | dilipkarki | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-21 | junjunh | 11 | view |
| 2019-10-21 | junjunh | 11 | view |
| 2019-10-21 | junjunh | 11 | view |
| 2019-10-04 | Huong Linh | 73 | view |
- Men do most of the high-level jobs. Should the government encourage a certain percentage of these jobs to be reserved for women?What is your opinion on that? 76
- The graph below shows the fertility rate of women of different Gulf Countries from 1990 to 2000 85
- The two graphs show the main sources of energy in the USA in the 1980s and the 1990s. 73
- The table below shows the results of surveys in 2000, 2005 and 2010 about one university. 11
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to in 2000 and 2010. 93
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, so, third, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 885.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88950276243 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84045609659 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552486187845 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.3819438322 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.625 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.625 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0634133535455 0.215688989381 29% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0314989403551 0.103423049105 30% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0398048398039 0.0843802449381 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0434505229019 0.15604864568 28% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0527456609113 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.