The table below shows the sales at a small restaurant in a down town business district. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The given tabular representation depicts the data about deal in city centre business district by small restaurants during October month(7 to 13 October). The data is calibrated in Dollars, which is clearly and coherently represented.
Tostart with, during the starting of week the amount spend was $2400 only for lunch, whereas for dinner the spendings were $3623. As the week preceeds, an upward trend was seen in the case of dinner expenditures, whereas the lunch spendings showed fluctuations.
Moving further, the expenditure for lunch and dinner was $2500 and $4350 respectively by the end of Friday. During two consecutive weekend days; the lunch and dinner deals both showed downfall upto $1500 and $1450 respectively.
Overall, the sales on dinner and lunch showed rising pattern during working days, which diminish to noticable extent during the weekend.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-20 | Haris98 | 56 | view |
| 2018-07-18 | suman_preetkaur | 11 | view |
| 2018-07-18 | suman_preetkaur | 11 | view |
| 2015-08-18 | I | 70 | view |
- different modes of transport used to travel in one European city in 1950 to 1970 and 1998 discussed in graph. write a report for a University lecturer describing the information in bar chart. 78
- The table shows the sales at a small restaurant in a down town business district. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- The table below shows the sales at a small restaurant in a down town business district. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- The diagram shows the stages and equipment used in cement making process and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes. 61
- the three Pie Charts below shows the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
whereas, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 33.7804878049 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 724.0 965.302439024 75% => OK
No of words: 135.0 196.424390244 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36296296296 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.4086580994 3.73543355544 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75796390176 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.644444444444 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 204.3 283.868780488 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.902380823 43.030603864 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 103.428571429 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2857142857 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.14285714286 5.23603664747 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0684484196099 0.215688989381 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0327929131745 0.103423049105 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0390171037684 0.0843802449381 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0457540156962 0.15604864568 29% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0311526752443 0.0819641961636 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.