The table shows the sales at a small restaurant in a down town business district. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The table shows the sales at a small restaurant in a down town business district. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The given tabular representation depicts the data about deal in downtown district by small restaurants during October month(7 to 13 October). The data is calibrated in Dollars, which is clearly and coherently represented.

To start with, during the starting of week the amount spend was $2400 only for lunch, whereas for dinner the spendings were $3623. As the week preceeds, an upward trend was seen in the case of dinner expenditures, whereas the lunch spendings showed fluctuations. The Deals on Tuesday showed slight upward variation, that is, $2450 and $3850 for lunch and dinner respectively.

Moving further,the spendings were $2595 and $2385 on lunch on Wednesday and Thursday respectively; whereas the sale was huge, that is, $3445 and $3800 on dinner in days of Wednesday and Thursday respectively. The expenditure for lunch and dinner was $2500 and $4350 respectively by the end of Friday. During two consecutive weekend days; the lunch and dinner deals both showed downfall upto $1500 and $1450 respectively.

Overall, the sales on dinner and lunch showed rising pattern during working days, which diminish to noticable extent during the weekend

Votes
Average: 1.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2018-07-18 suman_preetkaur 100 view
2018-07-18 suman_preetkaur 11 view
Essays by user suman_preetkaur :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 15, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...d dinner respectively. Moving further,the spendings were 595 and 385 on lunch on ...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
whereas, as for, to start with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 958.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2349726776 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84744025962 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546448087432 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 266.4 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.173319638 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.444444444 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0603010707103 0.215688989381 28% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0292210589428 0.103423049105 28% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0286475459514 0.0843802449381 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0454678912534 0.15604864568 29% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0199444814854 0.0819641961636 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.