The given table embodies the data about the profit of a small restaurant which sites in a downtown business block throughout 7th-13th of October.
Overall, it can be taken into consideration that public catering has dinner as the most lucrative period of the day throughout the week. It is also noticeable that on both lunch and dinner, the company had a static flow with the difference of plus or minus approximately one hundred and fifty dollars.
With regards to the lunchtime, a restaurant kept the plank over $2200 dollars per lunch in all seven days except weekends. Saturday and Sunday were the most disadvantaged days for an establishment, with an earning of $1950 and $1550 respectively. Whereas the most profitable afternoon was the Wednesday, taking to the cashier about $2600.
Meanwhile, dinners had to be the most beneficial hours during the day. With a gap of about several hours, dinnertimes provided $1200 more than lunches did. During the week, a company had its most fruitful day on Friday and lowest on weekends repeatedly.
- The idea of having a single career is becoming an old fashioned one The new fashion will be to have several careers or ways of earning money and further education will be something that continues throughout life 78
- In recent years the structure of a family and the role of its members are gradually changing What kinds of changes can occur Do you think these changes are positive and negative 56
- The graphs below show the types of music albums purchased by people in Britain according to sex and age Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 90
- Some schools have restricted the use of mobile phones Is this a positive development or a negative development 89
- Task 2 Writing Academic and General Training You should spend about 40 minutes on this task Write about the following topic Some young people believe it s best to move out of their hometowns when they become adults while others wish to live in their homet 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 864.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99421965318 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83528221165 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.664739884393 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.5864500184 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.0 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2222222222 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.11111111111 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0495846758576 0.215688989381 23% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0208552649885 0.103423049105 20% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0495347937616 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0437616958754 0.15604864568 28% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0666351156464 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.