The table below shows statistics about the top five countries for international tourism in 2012 and 2013
The table below compares the top five nations in terms of the number of visitors and the amount of money they spent over a period of two years.
In the years 2012 and 2013, France was clearly the most popular tourist destination in the globe. During the same time span, however, the United States received by far the highest income from tourists.
In 2012, France welcomed 83 million visitors. Followed by the USA with 66. 7 tourists. With 57. 5 and 57. 7 million people, Spain and China are in fourth and fifth place, respectively. With 46. 4 million visits, Italy came in sixth. In 2013, these figures revealed a slight increase of around 1 to 4 million visits in each country, except for China, which had a minor decrease of about 2 million individuals.
Tourist spending in the United States climbed from $126. 2 billion in 2012 to $139. 6 billion in 2013, more than double the amount spent in any other country. Following France, China, and Italy, Spain obtained the second biggest amount of tourist revenue, growing from $56. 3 billion to $60. 4 billion. Interestingly, despite lower tourist numbers, Chinese tourism income increased by $1. 7 billion in 2013.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-19 | tieuquynh | 73 | view |
| 2022-10-19 | tieuquynh | 89 | view |
| 2021-10-28 | _nhatlinhkhongnhat_ | 56 | view |
| 2021-08-17 | tungxuan | 84 | view |
| 2021-08-02 | tortoro5454 | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 377, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ers, Chinese tourism income increased by . 7 billion in 2013.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 963.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79104477612 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48537038969 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63184079602 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 8.94146341463 179% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 22.4926829268 53% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.2827867878 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 60.1875 112.824112599 53% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 12.5625 22.9334400587 55% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 1.9375 5.23603664747 37% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.09268292683 269% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157322332903 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0354851494602 0.103423049105 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0487170220059 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0890376908253 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0395684343571 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.4 13.2329268293 56% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.22 61.2550243902 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.61 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.4329268293 48% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.9970731707 62% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.