The table below shows statistics about the top five countries for international tourism in 2012 and 2013

Essay topics:

The table below shows statistics about the top five countries for international tourism in 2012 and 2013.

The table compares the five highest ranking countries in aspects of number of tourists and expenditure from tourism during the period of two years, starting from 2012.
Overall, France was the most popular destination among five nations in 2012. However, USA’s revenue from tourism accounted for the highest number.
It is envident that 83 million holidaymakers stopped by France, while USA just received 66,7 million tourists in 2012. At the same time, the number of visitors available in Spain and China was well under 58 million, but just only 46,4 million tourists went to Italy. 2013 saw a rise of between 1 and 4 million visitors in each country, with the exception of China, which the figure dwindled by 2 million.
We can see from the picture above that the tourist revenue for USA increased from $126,2 billion to $139,6 billion over the two-year period. Eventhough France had the largest tourist number during the period shown, its spending from tourism just rose slightly by $2,5 billion, followed by Spain and Italy. Interestingly, China saw an increase in this figure of well under $2 million despite the declining number of tourists in 2012.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (4 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-10-19 tieuquynh 73 view
2022-10-19 tieuquynh 89 view
2021-10-28 _nhatlinhkhongnhat_ 56 view
2021-08-17 tungxuan 84 view
2021-08-02 tortoro5454 73 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 108, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... number of tourists and expenditure from tourism during the period of two years, ...
^^
Line 3, column 336, Rule ID: WITH_THE_EXCEPTION_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'except' or 'except for'
Suggestion: except; except for
...and 4 million visitors in each country, with the exception of China, which the figure dwindled by 2 m...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 258, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...nding from tourism just rose slightly by ,5 billion, followed by Spain and Italy. ...
^^
Line 4, column 365, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...an increase in this figure of well under million despite the declining number of ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, well, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 963.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04188481675 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46015365799 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602094240838 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.1666186912 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.0 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2222222222 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.77777777778 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127019633933 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0614238300735 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0525908975555 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102829951953 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0631584872842 0.0819641961636 77% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.