The table describes the changes of people who went for international travel in 1990 1995 2000 and 2005 million Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The table describes the changes of people who went for international travel in 1990, 1995, 2000 and 2005. (million). Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The table displays the changes of international travellers in 1990, 1995, 2000 and 2005.
All things considered, the number of people travelling abroad to Europe far exceeded those of Middle East.
Firstly, there was a ceiling trend in the figure for international travel to America, Asia and the pacific as well as Europe. Europe, a destination where more and more foreigners visited, had a rise from 280.2 millions of visitors to 400.2 millions in 2005. This was followed by the same trend in America, where the figure for foreign travelers increased by 1.5 times from 80.5 to 118.2 million respectively in 1990 and 2000, after which this number soon fell by 5 million in 2005. In Asia and the pacific, after climbing to 80.3 in 1995 from the original number on 60.2 5 years ago, the figure rocketed to 135.8 million a decade later.
Secondly, even though there was an increase in the number of foreign travelers, the figure remained under 30 million. In the Middle East, a minority of 9.8 million paid a visit. The data then rose by 1.5 to 2.3 million in each five-year period, and this reached a top of 15.8 million in 2005. Africa, whose lowest number was 18.2 million in 1995 while the highest was 1.6 times higher, at 28.7 million international visitors. Moreover, the total figure for abroad tourism went up reasonably between 448.9 in 1990 and 693.7 in 2005.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-10-26 Giang Tran 73 view
2024-10-26 Giang Tran 84 view
2024-10-13 Giang Tran 73 view
2024-10-13 Giang Tran 84 view
2024-10-13 Giang Tran 73 view
Essays by user Bao Chau Phan :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 209, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '2 million'.
Suggestion: 2 million
...foreigners visited, had a rise from 280.2 millions of visitors to 400.2 millions in 2005. Thi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, well, while, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1136.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 237.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79324894515 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50845922353 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 106.607317073 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561181434599 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 324.0 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4978815208 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.272727273 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5454545455 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.36363636364 5.23603664747 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264527588332 0.215688989381 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115018242286 0.103423049105 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.098684174224 0.0843802449381 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200450407262 0.15604864568 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.125054562172 0.0819641961636 153% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.