The table displays trends concerning the amounts of fast food consumed in Melbourne Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Five Major Types of Fast Food Eaten in Melbourne units 2005 Pres

This table shows that the volume of consumption of five major fast foods in Melbourne in 2005, at present, and predicted for 2025.

Overall, The consumption of all the meals will increase in the future than its the past, however, some food will remain the same as the present. Although hamburger has been consumed highly and will be risen in future, noodles consume low amount. It can be seen that the salad will be eaten more in the future than in its past, however, fried chicken will increase fractional.

To additional describe, Hamburger has been consumed higher than other in 2005 which was 40 units but it is decreasing by 2 units at present, however, it is forecasted that it will grow and reach to 51. Moreover, Fried chicken increasing fractionally at present at 45, and will increase further to 45 units. The salad has become popular and increase by triples at present and will increase sharply. The less eating food including fried rice and noodles have fractional growth at present. Although fried rice will remain the same in 2025 at 9 units, noodles would be rise by 1 unit.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 29, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...or 2025. Overall, The consumption of all of the meals will increase in the future than ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 79, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
... meals will increase in the future than its the past, however, some food will remai...
^^^
Line 3, column 212, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
... been consumed highly and will be risen in future, noodles consume low amount. It can be ...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, moreover, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 1.00243902439 1097% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 910.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76439790576 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4613901317 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544502617801 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.6082128268 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.111111111 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2222222222 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.88888888889 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118197588642 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0619528646128 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0796394466218 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128020818118 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103683776021 0.0819641961636 126% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.