Over the decades, endangered species have been becoming extinct. While it is possible to increase expenditure slightly to protect endangered animals, it is not likely that spending money for them has no value. this essay will discuss why the budget for them should increase.
The small increment of the budget could save animals from being extinct. More spent money on their security and habitant could lead to potential growth numbers of animals. As a result, the ecosystem of nature remains fabulous. For example, the volume of panda has been decreasing all around the globe, which will cause the ecosystem somehow. In addition, every animal has its role in the ecology system which is balances nature. Therefore, the amount of money should rise in order to save endangered animals along with ecology.
Moreover, it is not likely that all expenditure for them is just waste as some people believed. All being including animals have the right to live on this planet. Every animal has a special character that has represents either the environment or for countries. For instance, while a one-horned rhino has becoming extict, most tourists coming to Nepal to watch them. As a result, it is also beneficial for a business like tourism for some countries. Hence, People should think about spending on endangered animals will be worth it somehow.
To conclude, However, some people believe money should be spending more than ever before, others believe it is a waste of money. In my opinion, a slight increment of spending could save the animals which are also responsible for a business including tourism and nature including ecosystem.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 211, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...t spending money for them has no value. this essay will discuss why the budget for t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, moreover, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in addition, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 8.36945812808 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1380.0 1207.87684729 114% => OK
No of words: 268.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14925373134 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55670814054 2.71678728327 94% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 139.433497537 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529850746269 0.580463131201 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 443.7 379.143842365 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 12.6551724138 134% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.5024630542 73% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.1153087878 50.4703680194 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 81.1764705882 104.977214359 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7647058824 20.9669160288 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.05882352941 7.25397266985 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26826025034 0.242375264174 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0791751175003 0.0925447433944 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0884913177524 0.071462118173 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163506758698 0.151781067708 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0430367635876 0.0609392437508 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 12.6369458128 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 53.1260098522 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 11.5310837438 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.32886699507 100% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 55.0591133005 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.94827586207 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.3980295567 77% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 67.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.