The deprivation of fundamental needs has been growing in poorer countries rapidly. Most wealthy countries are saying that they need to help as much financial as possible to keep secure destitute countries from the inevitable economic crisis. In this essay, I will explain why solely providing money might not function well and, yet rich nations need to show pragmatism.
The major attribute that developed countries could assist poor countries in academic aid. If the rich government allows high numbers of students from developing countries to study free and other allowance in their country, the undeveloped country would have potential and possibilities in the future. One girl from Syria had studied and graduated from Harvard University, as she returned home country, she started a new journey with free education in her town. Therefore, it is certain that education could help the county in sustainable ways.
Furthermore, financial aid can be detained due to mudslinging politics and politicians. One of the notions that have been developed over the decade that undeveloped countries have corrupt legislators and do not have a decent idea about the utilization of resources. Countries such as Nigeria, Haiti have been received an enormous amount of money from the international community, however, that it has not been used as it supposed to be. In addition, many African people dying due to poverty and starvation because of political instability. Subsequently, they become less responsive to their citizens. These evidences make clear that it is better to choose other alternatives rather than donating.
To conclude, due to politicians who always tried deceiving and hypocrisy to their citizens, I believe, financial aid has not been effective. Moreover, educational assistance could improve country conditions.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1552.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5231316726 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95159636044 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637010676157 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4709143398 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.466666667 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7333333333 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.46666666667 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306657314898 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0986823382337 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0884763012431 0.0667982634062 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17511435452 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0434852583618 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.