The table displays trends concerning the amounts of fast food consumed in Melbourne. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The table illustrates the amounts of fast food consumption in Melbourne over a period of 20 years between 2005 and 2025.
It is clear that the amounts of all types of convenience food increase over the period shown. Overall, hamburgers are by far the most popular choice for Melbourne consumers.
In 2005, 40 units of Hamburgers were consumed, compared to only 5 units of Salad. Now, people cut their hamburgers consumption by 2 units but Salads are consumed more with 15 units recorded. By 2025, the amount of salads consumed is predicted to continue to jump up by 25 units, becoming the third preferred food while that of Hamburgers is also expected to bounce back by 13.
Some striking differences are not seen in the amounts others. Despite there are some gradual increases, Fried Chicken remains to be the second most consumed food in every year. Similarly, the figures for fried rice and noodles are equally expected to rise from 6 to 9 by 2025.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-09 | grahamoneil | 84 | view |
| 2021-07-09 | grahamoneil | 78 | view |
| 2021-07-09 | grahamoneil | 84 | view |
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The number of people working online from home has grown in some countries What advantages and disadvantages can come of this trend 60
- The graph shows estimated oil production capacity for several Gulf countries between 1990 and 2010 61
- Advertising encourages customers to buy in quantity not in quality. To what extent you agree or disagree. 67
- Some universities offer online courses as an alternative to classes delivered on campus. Do you think this is a positive or negative development? 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, second, similarly, so, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 796.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82424242424 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61094679357 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624242424242 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 238.5 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.466769957 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.4444444444 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.55555555556 5.23603664747 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143835654724 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0590495965705 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.052386627478 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0978379730646 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0505111619406 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.