This table gives information about the forest area in some parts of the world for 15 years from 1995 to 2005.
It is clear from the table that millions of hectares of land to be used to plant forest all over the regions, but it is tending to decline.
In 1990, Europe was the locality which had the forested land to 989,000,000 hectares, meanwhile district, planted the least afforestation, was Oceania with total areas of 199,000,000 hectares, other places like Asia, South America... land for forest changed from 576,000,000 to 946,000,000, respectively. Over ten years, almost of regions decreased forested land, Asia and South America remained 570,000,000 and 904,000,000 hectares but Europe increased slightly about 9,000,000 hectares.
In 2005, some places had in contrast, tends like Asia, the area of land for afforestation was 18,000,000 ha higher than 2000 and Europe did. But in this time other places continued to come down as North America, South America, Africa…
This table gives information about the forest area in some parts of the world for 15 years from 1995 to 2005.
It is clear from the table that millions of hectares of land to be used to plant forest all over the regions, but it is tending to decline.
In 1990, Europe was the locality which had the forested land to 989,000,000 hectares, meanwhile district, planted the least afforestation, was Oceania with total areas of 199,000,000 hectares, other places like Asia, South America... land for forest changed from 576,000,000 to 946,000,000, respectively. Over ten years, almost of regions decreased forested land, Asia and South America remained 570,000,000 and 904,000,000 hectares but Europe increased slightly about 9,000,000 hectares.
In 2005, some places had in contrast, tends like Asia, the area of land for afforestation was 18,000,000 ha higher than 2000 and Europe did. But in this time other places continued to come down as North America, South America, Africa…
- The graph below shows changes in global food and oil prices between 2000 and 2011 73
- The line chart above compares waste products in tonnes among 3 companies A, B and C from 2000 to 2005.It can be seen from the graph that company A and B tended to produce less waste than they used to by the beginning. On the other hand, company C’s rate 67
- The pie graphs above show the different amount of water used for residential needs, industrial and agricultural purposes in San Diego, California and the World. It is clear that the water usage in the three places is generally different. In San Diego and 67
- The line graph compares three companies in terms of their waste output between the years 2000 and 2015 It is clear that there were significant changes in the amounts of waste produced by all three companies shown on the graph While companies A and B saw w 84
- The line chart above compares the difference in the consumption of the four types of boneless meat of four different species per capita.It is clear that there were significant changes in the choice of meat in the US from 1955 to 2012. In general, beef and 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 826.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22784810127 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75248791336 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.626582278481 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 225.0 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.2245954955 43.030603864 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.0 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5714285714 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.85714285714 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324033359401 0.215688989381 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.23572381977 0.103423049105 228% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.252747229424 0.0843802449381 300% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.365321444274 0.15604864568 234% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.267724129035 0.0819641961636 327% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.