The table illustrates the amount of energy production by five types of fuel in the UK in three different years 1990, 1996 and 2000 measured million tonnes.

Essay topics:

The table illustrates the amount of energy production by five types of fuel in the UK in three different years 1990, 1996 and 2000 measured million tonnes.

The table illustrates the amount of energy production by five types of fuel in the UK in three different years 1990, 1996 and 2000 measured million tonnes.
Looking at the table, it is immediately obvious that natural gas was the most popular in terms of source for energy production for UK users throughout the period shown. Additionally, it is also noted that hybrid power recorded by far the lowest figures over the 10-year period (between 1990 to 2000).
From 1990 to 2000, there was a significant increase in natural gas in the UK. In 1990, THE FIGURE for natural gas was just over 76 million tonnes and then rose up to 86 million tonnes in 1996 and reached the peak at 94 million tonnes in 2000. By contrast, the lowest figures namely hybrid power dropped slightly from 0.4 to 0.3 million tonnes in 1996 and then rose minimally in 2000, 0.5 million tonnes.
The figures for oil was 50 million tonnes in 1990. In 2000, while the amount of oil produced increase to 60 million tonnes, the quantity of coal decreased slightly to 23 million tonnes. On the other hand, after declining in 1996, the figure for nuclear power rose to around 35 million tonnes at the end of period.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2018-08-05 thoaily 67 view
Essays by user thoaily :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, so, then, while, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 973.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63333333333 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32272125181 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504761904762 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.5227205685 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.111111111 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.55555555556 5.23603664747 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.431259725295 0.215688989381 200% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.217335861017 0.103423049105 210% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.279451420743 0.0843802449381 331% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.376577727893 0.15604864568 241% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.360875674686 0.0819641961636 440% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.87 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.