The tabular chart depict the comparative analysis of five European nations spending on food , housing, clothing and entertainment.
Overall it is crystal clear that, consumers of given countries spent mainly on food , housing , entertainment category while, clothing is the least preferred for expenditure.
To commence, consumers of United Kingdom spent significant amount on housing by 37%. However, its spending goes down 10% in food in compares to housing. To add to it, on clothing and entertainment it considered as sharing proportion of income by 11% each . Furthermore, citizens of Turkey spend a sizeable portion on food and drink at 36% but, other category emerged as expenditure of just under 20%.
Whilst, spending on entertainment Germany people are remained on top than any other nation by expending of 19%on housing Germany expenses went on 33%, food 22% and clothing 15%. Additionally , there is most discrepancy in percentage of housing between Spain and France , where France (31%) expenses on housing almost doubled as Spain (18%). Whereas , on the other category there expenditure seems apparent as difference on food by 6%,clothing 1%and entertainment 2%.
- The graph below shows electricity production in terawatt hours in France between 1980 and 2012 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant
- In many big cities in the world the quality of life is decreasing What are the causes and solutions for this 89
- It is impossible to help all people in the world so governments should only focus on people in their own countries To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Computers are increasingly used in education In which areas do you think are computers more important and in which areas are teachers more important 84
- The pie charts below shows the result of a survey of children 039 s activities The first chart shows the cultural and leisure activities that boys participate in whereas the second chart shows the activities in which the girl participate 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 92, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...f five European nations spending on food , housing, clothing and entertainment. ...
^^
Line 2, column 84, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... of given countries spent mainly on food , housing , entertainment category while,...
^^
Line 2, column 94, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...countries spent mainly on food , housing , entertainment category while, clothing ...
^^
Line 3, column 255, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...sharing proportion of income by 11% each . Furthermore, citizens of Turkey spend a...
^^
Line 4, column 190, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... food 22% and clothing 15%. Additionally , there is most discrepancy in percentage...
^^
Line 4, column 268, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...tage of housing between Spain and France , where France 31% expenses on housing al...
^^
Line 4, column 344, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ing almost doubled as Spain 18%. Whereas , on the other category there expenditure...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 988.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45856353591 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06717090284 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640883977901 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 291.6 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4051278439 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.777777778 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1111111111 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.352701238252 0.215688989381 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132291839338 0.103423049105 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0576106654953 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201855808886 0.15604864568 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0220446973307 0.0819641961636 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 11.4140731707 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.