The table compares the differences of household expenditure spending for four purposes in five selected European countries in 2012.
It is immediately apparent that Food & drink and housing was two main items in which people spent their income. While much less money was spent on clothing and entertainment.
In Turkey and Spain, the highest category was Food & drink, which represented for around one third of the total household expenditure, at 37% and 31%, respectively. Then followed by hosing, both two countries spent about one fifth budget on this. Similarly, the figure of Turkey (20%) was slightly larger than that of Spain (18%). In contrast, the rest three countries showed a reverse pattern, which spent most in hosing. UK saw a largest proportion for more than one third (37%) in hosing, unremarkably higher than France and Germany, whose figure around one third, at 33% and 31% respectively. The relatively lower percentage can be seen in Food & drink, reaching approximate one fourth.
Clothing and Entertainment saw a significant lower proportion in all the countries. The largest consumption in Entertainment can be seen in Germany, around one fifth, at 19%. Followed by Spain and France, at about 15%. UK and Turkey were in a bottom position, just over 10%. Germany, UK and Turkey spent more than 10% on clothing while, the figure in France and Spain were lower.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 427, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...ern, which spent most in hosing. UK saw a largest proportion for more than one th...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, similarly, then, third, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1158.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 225.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14666666667 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81593976754 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551111111111 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 335.7 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.0039680353 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.7142857143 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0714285714 22.9334400587 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.28571428571 5.23603664747 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176814818692 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.061478171978 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0675993928713 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130296075741 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0803305623088 0.0819641961636 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.