The table shows the Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types between 2000 and 2009
The table illustrates the percentage of students enroll in four different kinds of schools from 2000 to 2009.
Overall, it is clear that the proportion of students attending specialist schools, grammar schools and voluntary - controlled schools dicreased while this figure for community schools increased.
In 2000, voluntary schools headed for the proportion of students, at 52% which is higher than the percentage of pupils enrolling in grammar schools (24%). 12% of students attending in specialist schools and community schools for each.
In 2009, the percentage of pupils going to voluntary - controlled schools declined dramatically to only 20%. Grammar schools and specialist schools also saw a slight decrease, to 12% and 10% respectively. In contrast, 2009 witnessed a significant increase of the student attendance in community schools, from 12% in 2000 to 58% in 2009.
- The table shows the worldwide market share of the mobile phone market for manufacturers in the years 2005 and 2006 67
- The graph below give information about total oil use if four main consumers from 2009 to 2030 75
- The two column charts show the percentage of food and other items bought by 3 European countries in 1998 and 2008 73
- Some people think that men and women have different qualities. Therefore, some certain jobs are suitable for men and some jobs are suitable for women. To what extent do you agree or disargee? 56
- More and more people think there is no need for printed newspapers. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 284, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nt increase of the student attendance in community schools, from 12% in 2000 to 5...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.48453608247 27% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 5.05154639175 79% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.03092783505 66% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 32.9175257732 9% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 26.3917525773 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.85567010309 78% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 745.0 937.175257732 79% => OK
No of words: 134.0 206.0 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55970149254 4.54256449028 122% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.40232815919 3.78020617076 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0115029614 2.54303337028 118% => OK
Unique words: 71.0 127.690721649 56% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529850746269 0.622605031667 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 197.1 290.88556701 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.13402061856 11% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.360824742268 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 0.824742268041 243% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 1.44329896907 416% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 12.6804123711 55% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 16.3608247423 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.0453229438 44.8134815571 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.428571429 76.5299724578 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1428571429 16.8248392259 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.57142857143 4.34317383033 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 2.54639175258 39% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 7.41237113402 40% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.94845360825 101% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329683550878 0.216113520407 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.172212176429 0.0766984524023 225% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0489073537048 0.0603063233224 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22680571996 0.12726935374 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0340021188276 0.0580467560999 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 8.37731958763 171% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 70.7449484536 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 7.45979381443 127% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 8.71597938144 172% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 7.59969072165 107% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 41.2886597938 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 8.62886597938 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 8.54432989691 112% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 8.15463917526 123% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.