The table show the proportions of pupils attending four secondary school types between 2000 and 2009.
The tabular revals that information of represention of teenagers attending four secondary school. It is given four schools and three years 2000 to 2009.
Moving a quick glance in the illustration, in 2000 was higher attend in voluntary-controlled schools in 52 proportion.Therefore, grammer schools was little bit declined in 2000. Then, specialist schools and community schools was equal attend in the schools in 12 percentage.
On the flip side, in 2005 voluntary- controlled schools was increased attended in the schools in 38 proportion. Afterthat, it was declined the attend in the community schools in 32 proportion. Hence, the student was not interested in specialist schools and grammer schools are lowest percentage in 2005. Furthermore, in 2009 the community schools was rose attented students are attended lecture in 58 proportion. Finally , specialist schools and grammer schools was decreased attended in any years in 2005 to 2009 was same ratio.
To sum up, in 2000 voluntary schools was increased attended in the school in 2005 and in 2009 community schools was secondary school attendance are more than highest attended in the schools. Then, in 2000 to 2009 specialist schools and grammer schools was plummed proportion in the schools.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 119, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Therefore
...ary-controlled schools in 52 proportion.Therefore, grammer schools was little bit decline...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 150, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...oportion.Therefore, grammer schools was little bit declined in 2000. Then, specialist scho...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 140, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... proportion. Afterthat, it was declined the attend in the community schools in 32 proporti...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 274, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'are the lowest'.
Suggestion: are the lowest
... specialist schools and grammer schools are lowest percentage in 2005. Furthermore, in 200...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 365, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the community schools was rose attented students are attended lecture in 58 pro...
^^
Line 5, column 402, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ted students are attended lecture in 58 proportion. Finally , specialist schools...
^^
Line 5, column 423, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ended lecture in 58 proportion. Finally , specialist schools and grammer schools ...
^^
Line 7, column 112, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ol in 2005 and in 2009 community schools was secondary school attendance are more...
^^^
Line 7, column 156, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'than the highest'.
Suggestion: than the highest
...as secondary school attendance are more than highest attended in the schools. Then, in 2000 ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, furthermore, hence, second, then, therefore, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1064.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42857142857 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23230300727 2.65546596893 122% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.454081632653 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 286.2 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.7538788987 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.7272727273 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8181818182 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.72727272727 5.23603664747 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 1.69756097561 530% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.322906141616 0.215688989381 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.188591850226 0.103423049105 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0696339131376 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.274537556659 0.15604864568 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0776540299392 0.0819641961636 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.