The proportion of students attending four seconsary school types between 2000 and 2009.
The assigned table chart depicts the information about that the ratio of students attending four secondary school kinds during 2000 and 2009.
Overall,it is clear that more students were attending voluntary controlled schools in 2000 to 2009.However ,the figures for pupils were least and remaining constant in specialist schoolin some period.
Turning towards the details , the percentage of pupils joining voluntary controlled schools was the highest ,accounting for 52%in 2000 ,but this figure was decreasing to 12%in after next 5 years .20%students were attending voluntary controlled school in 2009. Talking about specialist schools , the percentage of pupils who attended this school and remained same during 2000 from 2009.(12%,11%and 10%) respectively.
Moving Further, the relative number of children in grammer schools was more, amounting to 24%in 2000 as compared to 19% incase of 2005.after that these figures were declining sharply yo 12% in 2009.Talking about community schools ,in 2000 year ,the statistics for students attended these schools were the least at 12% ,it was noted to be that the ratio of students got double in 2005 , after that these figures were inclining dramatically and reaching peak point at 58% in 2009.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , it
...ool kinds during 2000 and 2009. Overall,it is clear that more students were attend...
^^^
Line 2, column 99, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
...tary controlled schools in 2000 to 2009.However ,the figures for pupils were least and ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 106, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ntrolled schools in 2000 to 2009.However ,the figures for pupils were least and re...
^^
Line 3, column 28, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ome period. Turning towards the details , the percentage of pupils joining volunt...
^^
Line 3, column 108, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ntary controlled schools was the highest ,accounting for 52%in 2000 ,but this figu...
^^
Line 3, column 135, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...s the highest ,accounting for 52%in 2000 ,but this figure was decreasing to 12%in...
^^
Line 3, column 167, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...%in 2000 ,but this figure was decreasing to 12%in after next 5 years .20%students...
^^
Line 3, column 293, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...n 2009. Talking about specialist schools , the percentage of pupils who attended t...
^^
Line 3, column 400, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ame during 2000 from 2009.12%,11%and 10% respectively. Moving Further, the relat...
^^
Line 4, column 121, Rule ID: INCASE_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'in case of'?
Suggestion: in case of
...unting to 24%in 2000 as compared to 19% incase of 2005.after that these figures were dec...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 146, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ompared to 19% incase of 2005.after that these figures were declining sharply yo ...
^^
Line 4, column 199, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Talking
...s were declining sharply yo 12% in 2009.Talking about community schools ,in 2000 year ,...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 230, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... in 2009.Talking about community schools ,in 2000 year ,the statistics for student...
^^
Line 4, column 244, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ng about community schools ,in 2000 year ,the statistics for students attended th...
^^
Line 4, column 282, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ar ,the statistics for students attended these schools were the least at 12% ,it ...
^^
Line 4, column 319, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ded these schools were the least at 12% ,it was noted to be that the ratio of st...
^^
Line 4, column 344, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he least at 12% ,it was noted to be that the ratio of students got double in 2005...
^^
Line 4, column 386, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...the ratio of students got double in 2005 , after that these figures were inclinin...
^^
Line 4, column 399, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...students got double in 2005 , after that these figures were inclining dramaticall...
^^
Line 4, column 442, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hese figures were inclining dramatically and reaching peak point at 58% in 2009.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, second, so, talking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1049.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52105263158 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80864384137 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568421052632 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 38.0 22.4926829268 169% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 124.865687841 43.030603864 290% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 209.8 112.824112599 186% => OK
Words per sentence: 38.0 22.9334400587 166% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8 5.23603664747 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 20.0 1.69756097561 1178% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319954191478 0.215688989381 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.218111762518 0.103423049105 211% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0501723938994 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235451865072 0.15604864568 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0518516449234 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 23.6 13.2329268293 178% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.37 61.2550243902 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.9 10.3012195122 164% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.33 11.4140731707 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.2 10.9970731707 156% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 11.0658536585 154% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.