The table shows the amount of money given in aid of technology of developing countries by charities in the US EU and other countries from 2006 to 2010

The given chart demonstrates the financial funds that America, European and other countries allocating to some developing ones in 4-year period, starting from 2006.
It is obvious that all three mentioned countries had an increase in their funding for and the total amount of money spent on developing countries from 2006 to 2010. In the year 2010, The US surpassed other countries in terms of funding for a number of developing countries. .
In the period of 4 year, starting from 2006, there was always a steady growth in the USA government’s funds until 2010 of more than 10 million dollars in the money which developing countries were received from the USA. and the highest percentage observed is in the last year of this period, with a total of 20.3 million USD in the mentioned countries, which was 5 times higher than the EU and other regions, 4,1, and 3,7 million dollars in specific.
A 4-year mentioned period witnessed an upward trend in the money of the government in three regions: USA, EU and the other countries donated for some developing countries, just over 15 million USD in 2006, but there was a noticeable rise in this funds in 4 years later, with 28.1 million USD.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 123, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...countries allocating to some developing ones in 4-year period, starting from 2006. ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 275, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...g for a number of developing countries. . In the period of 4 year, starting fro...
^
Line 3, column 220, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: And
...g countries were received from the USA. and the highest percentage observed is in t...
^^^
Line 4, column 293, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n 4 years later, with 28.1 million USD.
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 988.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81951219512 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61981256062 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526829268293 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 22.4926829268 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.7924787329 43.030603864 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 164.666666667 112.824112599 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.1666666667 22.9334400587 149% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.83333333333 5.23603664747 35% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.328254325311 0.215688989381 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.20325156648 0.103423049105 197% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0883187150664 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.233216468005 0.15604864568 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0918530325984 0.0819641961636 112% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 13.2329268293 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.35 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.27 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.9970731707 142% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.