The table shows the expenditure on various types of food in one European country in 1992, 2002 and 2012
The given illustration provides how much was spent on different foodstuffs in Italia in the years 1992, 2002 and 2012.
It is clear that people showed their preference for beer and chicken rather than other types of food in 1992, 2002 and 2012.
There was an increase in the number of people spending on chicken from 1992 to 2012: about 38 million of euros in 1992, 41 million of euros in 2002, 56 million of euros in 2012 while the amount spent on coffee dropped from 9 million of euros in 1992 to 7 million of euros in 2002. In addition to, the expenditure on coffee remained the same stable at 7 million of euros in 2012. Besides, the amount spent on beef had a fluctuation over the period: about 45 million of euros in 1992, 43 million of euros in 2002 and 54 million of euros in 2012.
In 2002, the expenditure on potatoes was twice as much as those on coffee: about 14 million of euros and 7 million of euros. The amount spent on beef was high in comparison with those on chicken in 1992 while the expenditure on chicken was bigger than those on beef in 2012.
- The chat below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- People think that government should increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles to solve environmental problems Give your opinion 61
- The charts below show the proportion of people s spending on different commodities and services in particular European country in 1958 and in 2008 67
- The graph below shows the amount of electricity produced from different energy sources to supply the city of New York between 1980 to 2000 61
- Topic Researcher shows that global warming is caused by human activity What are the possible reasons and effects of climate change and what can government and individuals do to reduce these 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 33.7804878049 154% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 870.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.32835820896 4.92477711251 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28260094467 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.432835820896 0.547539520022 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 240.3 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.412836866 43.030603864 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.285714286 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.7142857143 22.9334400587 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210435587196 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126669926703 0.103423049105 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.065179728205 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163048902241 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0677631827316 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 76.9 61.2550243902 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.43 11.4140731707 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.52 8.06136585366 81% => OK
difficult_words: 19.0 40.7170731707 47% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 11.4329268293 149% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.