The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.
The given table illustrates the wild area in millions of hectares reported from 6 parts of the world over the course of 15 years starting from 1990 .
In general, it is clear that Europe had the largest forested land among 6 regions during a 15-year period, followed by South America and Africa.
The forest area in Europe increased significantly from 989 to 1001 million hectares. That figures of Asia witnessed the same trend by rising to 584 million hectares. However, South America and Africa experienced an opposite trend, the amount of their land provided for jungle has a considerable fall before reaching it bottom in 2005. In Oceania, there was a slight decrease in 2000 and reached a lowest point at 197 million hectares, it was also the smallest forested area reported in 2005.
The figures for North America have fluctuated over 15 years, it decreased by 3 million hectares in 2000 and then remained the same (705 million hectares) in the year 2005.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-25 | Shivam7090 | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-21 | Spring2019 | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-18 | hung253 | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-18 | lyvvu | 61 | view |
| 2019-11-03 | Anbill | 56 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 148, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...he course of 15 years starting from 1990 . In general, it is clear that Europe ...
^^
Line 5, column 321, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'bottoms'?
Suggestion: bottoms
... a considerable fall before reaching it bottom in 2005. In Oceania, there was a slight...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 397, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...s a slight decrease in 2000 and reached a lowest point at 197 million hectares, i...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, then, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 812.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9512195122 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53269529445 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.615853658537 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 238.5 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.0212763319 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.0 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4285714286 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57142857143 5.23603664747 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143874222275 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0680566078966 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0390824938652 0.0843802449381 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0920654353901 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0364049615184 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.