The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The provided table compares the forested land of different six countries, namely, Africa, Asia, Europe, North America, Oceania and South America in the period of fifteen years. The unit of given data is millions of hectares.
On the whole, the proposition of forested land was descending in Africa , North America , Oceania and south America , however, there was ascending in Europe and Asia.
In Africa , the forested land was descending from 749 in 1990 to 691 in 2005. Similarly there steadily decline in Oceania and south America from 199 to 197 and 946 to 882 respectively. Moreover, the amount of forested land in North America was 708 in 1990 and it dropped slightly in 2000 (705), however, it was plateau until 2005.
In contrast, the forested land in Europe was 989 in 1990 and which increased gradually from 989 to 1001 over the period of 1.5 decades.furthermore , the forested land of Asia was 570 in 1990 , which was fall until 2000, although there was significant rise to reach at 584 in 2005.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-25 | Shivam7090 | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-21 | Spring2019 | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-18 | hung253 | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-18 | lyvvu | 61 | view |
| 2019-11-03 | Anbill | 56 | view |
- The chart shows the proportion of seats an airline was able to fill at three time points.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The graph shows the number of minutes of three types of phone calls in Australia between 1992-2000.Summarise the information in the charts and make comparisons where appropriate. 56
- The graph shows the percentage of males and females who hold each type of qualification in 2005 in NZ Summarise the information in the charts and make comparisons where appropriate 54
- The chart below shows the amount of leisure time enjoyed by men and women of different employment status. 67
- The graph shows the results of a survey of British public figures that people can recognise from their photographs.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 72, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...f forested land was descending in Africa , North America , Oceania and south Ameri...
^^
Line 3, column 88, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...was descending in Africa , North America , Oceania and south America , however, th...
^^
Line 3, column 116, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...orth America , Oceania and south America , however, there was ascending in Europe ...
^^
Line 5, column 10, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...scending in Europe and Asia. In Africa , the forested land was descending from 7...
^^
Line 5, column 79, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
...ending from 749 in 1990 to 691 in 2005. Similarly there steadily decline in Oceania and s...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 147, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...er the period of 1.5 decades.furthermore , the forested land of Asia was 570 in 19...
^^
Line 7, column 191, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...he forested land of Asia was 570 in 1990 , which was fall until 2000, although the...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, moreover, similarly, so, in contrast, on the whole
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 834.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87719298246 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70348281015 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497076023392 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.0360644249 43.030603864 165% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.142857143 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4285714286 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8571428571 5.23603664747 207% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.105571938885 0.215688989381 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0596444475601 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0306186683467 0.0843802449381 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0772049531519 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0283914521264 0.0819641961636 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.