The table illustrates the hectares of woodlands in six different areas of the world during 1990, 2000 and 2005. Overall, Europe had high forested land, while Oceania had the least area under forests.
From the chart, it is evident that Europe and Asia are the only two countries with an upward trend in forest year during the 15 year time period. In Europe, the woodland area showed a significant rise from 989 million hectares in 1990 to 1001 million hectares in 2005 which indicates an increase up to 12 million hectares. Similarly, there is a marginal improvement from 576 million hectares to 584 million hectares in Asia.
All the remaining countries showed a downfall in the forest area. Regarding Africa and South America, the figures accounted for 749 and 946 million hectares respectively. However, it fell down by 58 million hectares in Africa and by 64 million hectares in South Africa during 2005. Meanwhile, the area under woodlands reduced by about 2-3 million hectares in Oceania and North America.
- Argument Essay:-"For many years the city of Grandview has provided annual funding for the Grandview Symphony. Last year, however, private contributions to the symphony increased by 200 percent and attendance at the symphony's concerts-in-the-park series d 63
- In many countries, good schools and medical facilities are available only in cities. SOme people think new teachers and doctors should work in rural areas for a few years. But other people think everyone should have the freedom to choose where they work. 73
- The diagram below shows two different processes for manufacturing black tea. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature. and make comparison where relevant. 73
- The Processes below show how glass containers, such as bottles, are produced and recycled. 61
- Some universities now offer their courses on the Internet so that people can study online.Is this a positive or negative development? 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, regarding, similarly, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 850.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02958579882 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53373306174 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.585798816568 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 252.9 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.3424894606 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.4444444444 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7777777778 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88888888889 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219517045575 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0999762019386 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0418627957038 0.0843802449381 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1526693748 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00286275386761 0.0819641961636 3% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.