The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The chart illustrates how many hectares of forested land in 6 separate continents changed over the course of 15 years starting 1990. In general, over the period, Europe owned the largest forest area while the Oceania had the smallest forest areas.
It is clear from the table that only Asia and Europe increased their forest cover. In 1990, Europe started with 989 million hectares of forest. Afterwards, the figure increased slightly by 12 million hectares in 2005. Similarly, in Asia, forest covered 576 million hectares at the beginning of the period. Then, there was a marginal rise in the number of hectares land covered by forest in Asia from 576 to 584 million in 2005.
In contrast, Africa, North America, Oceania, South America witnessed a downward trend over 15 years. Regarding Africa and South America, these figures accounted for 749 and 946 hectares relatively. Subsequently, these two continents forested land decreased dramatically, Africa fell by 58 million hectares, South America fell by 64 million hectares. Meanwhile, the forest land in North America and Oceania dropped gradually by about 2-3 million hectares.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-08 | mifas meleraroth | 56 | view |
| 2019-08-27 | Mike1510 | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-27 | Sai sushma | 56 | view |
| 2019-08-27 | Sai sushma | 56 | view |
| 2019-09-08 | mifas meleraroth | 56 | view |
- The two pie charts show the types of communication used in 1962 and 1982. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparation where relevant. 61
- The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Some people believe that all children in school should be required to learn at least one foreign language. However, others say that those who are not talents should not have to learn.What is your opinion? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
regarding, similarly, so, then, while, in contrast, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 956.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2817679558 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60451388312 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585635359116 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.3693379059 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.9090909091 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4545454545 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.63636363636 5.23603664747 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195518400635 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0895828394996 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0415321738976 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130981042959 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0417763684427 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.