The demonstrated table illustrates the proportion of mobile phone users using 7 types of features, in the 3 particular years as 2006, 2008, and 2010,
Overall, it is clear that users showed more eagerness to make calls all the three years while playing music had lowest percentage at the end of the mentioned year compared with other features.
In 2006 and 2008 the percentage of Phone calls was same at 100% while in 2010 the propontion of phone calls had a slight decrease at 99% ; the percentage of taking photos has been increased in 2010 at 76% compared with 2006 at 66% and 2008 at 71%. In contrast, the proportion of sending and recoeving text in 2006 was at 73% then it rose slightly in the year of 2008 and 2010 at 75% and 79%.
As it is more observed, playing games has been shown more interest in 2010 at 42% compared with 2006 at 17% but it minimally lost interest by 1% in 2010 while seaching internet and record video has became popular when it was available in 2008 at 41% and 9% and in the year of 2010 it soared modestly at 73% and 35% respectively. In contrast, the percentage of playing music has been increased gradually in 2006, 2008 and 2010 at 12%, 18% and 26% respectively.
Votes
Essay reference notes: This topic is refereed from another essay topic, developed by user: yoon2102
Essay Categories
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 238, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...erness to make calls all the three years while playing music had lowest percentag...
^^
Line 1, column 260, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'had the lowest'.
Suggestion: had the lowest
...ll the three years while playing music had lowest percentage at the end of the mentioned ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 199, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'become'.
Suggestion: become
... seaching internet and record video has became popular when it was available in 2008 a...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 984.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.45248868778 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5318841728 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502262443439 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 266.4 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 44.0 22.4926829268 196% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 89.9631035481 43.030603864 209% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 196.8 112.824112599 174% => OK
Words per sentence: 44.2 22.9334400587 193% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 5.23603664747 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1113283811 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0677965584545 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0752838140302 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.077104529764 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0741084309493 0.0819641961636 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.6 13.2329268293 163% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.66 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.7 10.3012195122 152% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.42 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 27.0 11.4329268293 236% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 19.6 10.9970731707 178% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.