The table shows the percentage of mobile phone owners using various mobile phone features.
The presented table reveals the proportion of people making use of cell phones for different purposes from 2006 to 2010.
Overall, the period witnessed an upward trend in the usage of mobile phone features, except for making calls. In addition, making calls was the most popular function of the cell phone. It is also noticeable that there were no figures provided for searching the Internet and recording video in 2006.
In 2006, at a staggering 100%, the percentage of mobile phone users making phone calls was the highest figure, followed by 73% sending and receiving messages and 66% taking photos. 17% and 12% were recorded in the figure for playing games and playing music in turns. Over 4 years, the figure for making calls drop minimally to 99%. Conversely, the proportion of cell phone owners taking photos and communicating through messages showed a moderate increase to 76% and 79% respectively. Likewise, the percentage of cell phone users playing games rocketed to 41%, while the figure for playing music doubled, with 26% in 2010.
Regarding the other categories, with no data given in 2016, the percentage of people using the mobile phone to search the internet was 41%, exponentially higher than the figure for recording video, with only 9% in 2018. Over two years, both figures surged to 73% and 35% in turns.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-19 | Forhad Hossain Rabbi | 73 | view |
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 73
- The chart shows the unemployment situation in Australia in the year 2012 67
- The table shows the percentage of mobile phone owners using various mobile phone features 47
- The bar chart shows the percentage of businesses that have social media presence 88
- The chart below shows the amount of leisure time enjoyed by men and women of different employment status 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, if, likewise, regarding, so, while, except for, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1116.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02702702703 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50558988731 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554054054054 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 326.7 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.631679159 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.454545455 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1818181818 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269509617404 0.215688989381 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0997602683075 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0837282984164 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16789423167 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0248658221761 0.0819641961636 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.