The provided chart illustrates the proportion of students who gave good rating for variety aspects of a university in China during a period of 10 years.
Overall, it is clear that while learners have positive mindset toward technical quality, print resources, electronic resources and buildiing and teaching facilities, the opposite was true for range of modules offers. It is also notable that, print resources was received the highest good rating among 5 aspects between 2000 and 2010.
As we can see from the chart, print resources witnessed a significant growth to 95% before experiencing a marginal fall of 4% in 2010. The proportion of good rating for technical quality increased slighly to 69% at the end of the period. Moreover, electric resources witnessed a dramatic rise in good rating. To be specific, in 2010 nearly 90% respondants to the survey giving good rating for electric resources , 2 times as much as that in 2005.
Looking at the chart for more detail, At 75%, the building and teaching facilities stay unchanged during the period. In constrast, the percentage of good rating by students for range of modules offered witnessed a slight downward trend of 7% in 2010.
- The table shows percentage of students giving good rating for different aspects of a university in China in 2000 2005 2010 79
- Plan A below shows a health centre in 2005 Plan B shows the same place in the present day Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 91, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tudents who gave good rating for variety aspects of a university in China during ...
^^
Line 5, column 412, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...iving good rating for electric resources , 2 times as much as that in 2005. Loo...
^^
Line 7, column 38, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Looking at the chart for more detail, At 75%, the building and teaching facili...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, moreover, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1000.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10204081633 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76026401548 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591836734694 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 289.8 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.625182006 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.111111111 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7777777778 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88888888889 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.338187477741 0.215688989381 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139025263806 0.103423049105 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100782129213 0.0843802449381 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200611863377 0.15604864568 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0492633989558 0.0819641961636 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.