the table shows the proportions of pupils attending four secondary school types between 2000 and 2009
The table illustrates the percentages of students in terms of four different secondary school categories in the year 2000, 2005 and 2009.
Overall, while the numbers of students going to Specialist schools, Grammar schools and Voluntary-controlled schools reduced throughout the years, there were significant rises in the proportions of Public schools' students.
Community schools were attracting more students to enroll in, from 12% of the total number of students in 2000 to 32% in 2005, and reaching more than half of all pupils in 2009. By contrast, there were 52% of students taking part in Voluntary-controlled schools in 2000. However, this proportion dramatically dropped to 38% in 2005 before going down again to 20% in 2009.
Grammar schools also saw slighter decreases in the percentages of pupils attending in these years. To be precise, 24% of students went to Grammar schools in 2000, and only 12% of them attended classes in 2009. The proportions of pupils enrolled in Specialist schools remained relatively stable with minimal reduction, from 12% in 2000 to 10% in 2009.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-15 | reverjae | 84 | view |
| 2023-10-18 | Siska Umila Adha | 70 | view |
| 2023-07-31 | Chyka | view | |
| 2023-07-29 | Siska Umila Adha | view | |
| 2023-07-29 | Siska Umila Adha | 70 | view |
- The chart shows British Emigration to selected destinations between 2004 and 2007 77
- The continued rise in the world's population is the greatest problem faced by humanity at the present time. What are the causes of this continued rise? Do you agree that it is the greatest problem faced by humanity? 73
- The chart below shows the total number of Olympic medals won by twelve different countries 62
- The percentage of people using various mobile phone features 62
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 922.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29885057471 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12829559347 2.65546596893 118% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540229885057 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4676347352 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.25 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.352277466481 0.215688989381 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.163474592798 0.103423049105 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0670823133846 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225558785542 0.15604864568 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0770319392832 0.0819641961636 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.