The table shows the worldwide market share of the mobilephone market for manufactures in the years 2005 and 2006.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant .
The table illustrates , the total amount of global mobile phone manufactures and sales asset during the year of 2005 and 2006. Units are measured in percentage share of market.
Overall, the leading company of mobile phone market was Nokia, which increasing their share to the market approximately 32.5% in 2005 and 35 % by 2006. While BenQ mobile was the lowest level in 2005 (only 4.9%) which fell down their status in the share market following year with a mere 2.4%. Furthermore, Motorola and Samsung had later highest position in sales and manufacturing of mobile phone.
With regards to mobile phone sales, Motorola spent 17.1% share of market in 2005 whereas it rose to 21.1% by 2006. While Samsung started their percentage of share with 12.7 % in 2005, which fell down to 11.8% by next year. Sony Ericsson also had a significant percentage of share on the mobile phone market from 2005 and 2006 ( about 6.3% and 7.4 % respectively). Moreover, LG remained almost stable in global mobile phone sales.
According to the table, other companies also had some share in worldwide market share about 19.2% in 2005 whilst it declined to 16.2 % by 2006. In brief total amount of share percentage in the mobile phone market was equal (100%) in both years.
- The bar chart below shows transport preferences among young people in four countries in a single year Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- Some people say that no one should work after the age of 65 others say that anyone should be able to continue working for as long as they wish Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit during the same two periods Summari 78
- Scientists say that in the future humanity will speak the same language. Do you think this is a positive or negative social development? 78
- Some governments spend a lot of public money training up individuals to be successful in international sporting events Some people believe that this money should be spent on things that will benefit the general public instead To what extent do you agree o 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 22, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
The table illustrates , the total amount of global mobile phone...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ured in percentage share of market. Overall, the leading company of mobile p...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 162, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...imately 32.5% in 2005 and 35 % by 2006. While BenQ mobile was the lowest level in 200...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 363, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...a and Samsung had later highest position in sales and manufacturing of mobile pho...
^^
Line 3, column 409, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ales and manufacturing of mobile phone. With regards to mobile phone sal...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 335, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space after the opening parenthesis
Suggestion: (
... mobile phone market from 2005 and 2006 ( about 6.3% and 7.4 % respectively). More...
^^
Line 5, column 439, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...st stable in global mobile phone sales. According to the table, other com...
^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'furthermore', 'if', 'moreover', 'so', 'whereas', 'while', 'in brief']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.301204819277 0.268076937826 112% => OK
Verbs: 0.0843373493976 0.116061578633 73% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0763052208835 0.0759168565197 101% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0361445783133 0.0366838410393 99% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0200803212851 0.0131127313244 153% => OK
Prepositions: 0.14859437751 0.155750635184 95% => OK
Participles: 0.0200803212851 0.0379272487307 53% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.44905621858 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0240963855422 0.0210936926555 114% => OK
Particles: 0.00401606425703 0.00175180941692 229% => OK
Determiners: 0.0562248995984 0.0948980150116 59% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.00437022459523 0% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0120481927711 0.00967000014798 125% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1289.0 1161.00487805 111% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.9 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.9400921659 5.90752243213 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73763899035 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.304147465438 0.337110787985 90% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.15668202765 0.247514529752 63% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.115207373272 0.171178102325 67% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0783410138249 0.112407865282 70% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44905621858 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506912442396 0.546246751206 93% => OK
Word variations: 45.2368372345 49.3433353143 92% => OK
How many sentences: 11.0 8.93414634146 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.7272727273 23.0094962315 86% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.1012741893 42.9750493124 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.181818182 135.714022679 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7272727273 23.0094962315 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.727272727273 0.689975730869 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.84146341463 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.48048780488 473% => OK
Readability: 35.3954754922 47.7609492067 74% => OK
Elegance: 3.34285714286 2.94281807926 114% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.447593530642 0.418131533498 107% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.127884049681 0.181151798455 71% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0844156062784 0.0850326197045 99% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.621780584436 0.706616315825 88% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.151611044205 0.157042692854 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.222954746239 0.228904883108 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.13858952628 0.108899403657 127% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.49586583755 0.367819155151 135% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0453700193433 0.0812612215331 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.367441530584 0.316326947829 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0959998060807 0.0921553760075 104% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70731707317 243% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.14146341463 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.08536585366 24% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 9.0 3.16585365854 284% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 0.956097560976 105% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 3.02926829268 33% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 7.1512195122 154% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.