Many claim that the fast food industry had a negative effect on the environment, eating habits, and families.
To what extend do you agree or disagree?
Many argued that the junk food business would make a detrimental effect on many areas including the habitat, families and eating patterns. However, this essay agrees with the statement due to the fact of escalating environmental destructions, medical problems.
Fast-food restaurants are surging rapidly because of the customers rush and easy accessibility and availability. Many canned and junk foods are widely used in modern generations because they would be carriageable and manageable when compared to homemade foods. However, such trash and waste materials of fast food may lead to pernicious consequences to the habitat. For example, most of the fast-food makers are used plastic Cannes and coverings for the maximum expiry of the inside products. It is often non-reversible and non-recyclable materials that would make a negative impact on normal flora and fauna and habitat extinctions. For instance, recent ocean survey reports in India open up that sea creatures are frequently destroyed by plastic waste ingestion.
Reports from the medical fields also showcase the fast-food problems in increasing health issues due to the food changing patterns. Many bulletins is expressing the concern over diabetes, cardiovascular and obesity problems in all generations about the varying food habit. The junk food industry is often added preservatives and processed food have highly contagious materials which would act as a silent killer. On the other hand, employees frequently relayed on fast food in family gatherings to avoid stress which may adversely affect gatherings joined pleasures and happiness to the core. To explain with, old generations always depends on homemade foods for functions which would expand the interpersonal relationship inside the members.
To sum up, the modern lifestyle insists to cope with the fast-food makers and restaurants in many ways. Nevertheless, the drastic effect would be higher in many fields including nature, eating styles and relations.
- The trend of increased consumer goods production is damaging the natural environment. Why is it still happening? What are the solutions for this situation? 89
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main 78
- Face-to-face communication is better than other types of communication such as letters, email, or telephone calls.How far you agree or disagree with this statement? 73
- some people who choose a job early and keep doing it are more likely to get a satisfying career life than those who frequently change their jobs.To what extend do you agree or disagree? 67
- The graph shows the information about the international conferences in three capital cities in 1980 2010 82
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 148, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[4]
Message: You should probably use: 'are'.
Suggestion: are
... food changing patterns. Many bulletins is expressing the concern over diabetes, c...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, for example, for instance, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 24.0651302605 25% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1695.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.63122923588 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97092082861 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584717607973 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 19.3199953991 49.4020404114 39% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 113.0 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0666666667 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46666666667 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23107820444 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0773416524562 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0466214553352 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149901777798 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0261649030971 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.24 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.