The tables below give information abou sales of Fairtrade*-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The tables below give information abou sales of Fairtrade*-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The two table illustrate the number of fairtrade-labelled performance in two types of goods from 1999 to 2004 at several countries, where includes uk, switzerland, belgium, Sweden and Denmark.
it can be clearly seen that uk is the leader at the sales of coffee at 2004, whereas switzerland is leading the bananas market. Overall, the coffee sales of these five countries rise significantly.
In 1999, switzerland was the leader whether it was coffee or bananas, earned 3 and 15 millions of euros respectively, raised to 290 and 47 millions of euros until 2004. For uk, it became the coffee leadership at 2004 from 1.5 to 20 millions of euros, while the sales of bananas was 5.5 millions of euros.
For Denmark, the trend of coffee was increased by 0.2 millions to 2 millions at 2004, while the bananas sales was dropped rapidly from 2 to 0.9 millions of euros. The varieties sales of belgium were also increased, from 1 and 0.6 to 1.7 and 4 millions of euros independently. Lastly, Sweden’s coffee sales was raised by 0.7 from 1 millions of euros as well as fell from 1.8 to 1 millions of euros at bananas market.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-05-22 cocococo123 73 view
Essays by user cocococo123 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...tzerland, belgium, Sweden and Denmark. it can be clearly seen that uk is the lead...
^^
Line 3, column 84, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '15 million'.
Suggestion: 15 million
... it was coffee or bananas, earned 3 and 15 millions of euros respectively, raised to 290 and 4...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 137, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '47 million'.
Suggestion: 47 million
...f euros respectively, raised to 290 and 47 millions of euros until 2004. For uk, it became the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 229, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '20 million'.
Suggestion: 20 million
...e coffee leadership at 2004 from 1.5 to 20 millions of euros, while the sales of bananas was 5...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 284, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '5 million'.
Suggestion: 5 million
...euros, while the sales of bananas was 5.5 millions of euros. For Denmark, the trend of coffe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 143, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '9 million'.
Suggestion: 9 million
...s sales was dropped rapidly from 2 to 0.9 millions of euros. The varieties sales of belgium w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 241, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '4 million'.
Suggestion: 4 million
...so increased, from 1 and 0.6 to 1.7 and 4 millions of euros independently. Lastly, Sweden&apo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 334, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '1 million'.
Suggestion: 1 million
...s;s coffee sales was raised by 0.7 from 1 millions of euros as well as fell from 1.8 to 1 mil...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 382, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '1 million'.
Suggestion: 1 million
...ns of euros as well as fell from 1.8 to 1 millions of euros at bananas market.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, lastly, so, well, whereas, while, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 929.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73979591837 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90780072928 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510204081633 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.3409730341 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.125 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 1.69756097561 530% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158004916445 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0882381599792 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0361232718892 0.0843802449381 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118834172343 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0327707465119 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.