The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade - labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, make comparisons where relevant.
The given tables illustrate the information about sales of coffee and bananas which has been labelled by Fairtrade in 5 different European countries over 5 year period in between 1999 and 2004. In general, sales of both products had grown within this period in European countries.
The tremendous increase can be noticed from sales of coffee in UK from 1.5 million to 20 million euros between 1999 and 2004. Sales of coffee in Switzerland has been doubled within five years from 3 million to 6 million. Despite, it is depicted from the table that there is slight increase in sales of coffee in Denmark and Sweden from 1.8 to 2 million and from 0.8 to 1 million over 5 years respectively. Similarly, the sales in Belgium also has been grown in small share from 1 to 1.7 million euros.
Numbers in sales of banana has got totally difference from sales of coffee. The huge spike can be seen in sales of banana in Switzerland from 15 to 47 million euros from 1999 to 2004. In UK, sales have swelled up from 1 to 5.5 million and in Belgium this figure has climbed from 0.6 to 4 million over 5 years period. However, in Sweden and Denmark, we can see downward figures which lead to reduction in sales of banana from 1.8 million to 1 million and 2 million to 0.9 million euros respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-09-27 | Anil Thapa | 61 | view |
| 2022-07-13 | hoanghihi1234 | 61 | view |
| 2018-12-06 | dangtrinhlt | 84 | view |
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 73
- The graph below shows the changes in food consumption by Chinese people between 1985 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 88
- the bar chart below shows the percentage of people in Great Britain living alone by age and sex in 2004 and 2005 54
- Damage to the environment is an inevitable consequence of worldwide improvements in the standard of living 76
- In many countries children are engaged in some kind of paid work. Some people regard this as completely wrong, while others consider it as valuable work experience, important for learning and taking responsibility. Discuss both these views and give yo 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, similarly, so, well, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 33.7804878049 181% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1063.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 233.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.56223175966 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48622723562 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.459227467811 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 304.2 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7703243942 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.3 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167792965381 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0975663799356 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0871312722485 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164729239351 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108409591313 0.0819641961636 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.