The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade - labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, make comparisons where relevant.

The tables illustrate the data about the sales of fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in the UK, Switzerland, Denmark, Belgium, and Sweden in two different years 1999 and 2004.

As is observed in the table, the highest sale of fairtrade-labelled coffee was in Switzerland in 1999 with 3 million of euros which was followed by Denmark at 1.8 million of euros. In the same year, the lowest sale was made in Sweden at 0.8 million euros. Britain and Belgium had 1.5 million of euros and 1million euro sales of coffee respectively. The sales of coffee in Britain increased rapidly from 1999 to 2004 whereas there was a slight rise in all four countries.

According to second table, in both years, Switzerland had the largest sales of fairtrade-labelled bananas at 15 million of euros in 1999 and 47 million of euros in 2004. In contrast to this, bananas were the least product sold in Belgium at 0.6 million euro and suffered slight uplift to 4 million of euros in 2004. Likewise, Denmark which was in third position for the sales of bananas in 1999 dropped to the last position in 2004.

Overall, Britain, Switzerland and Belgium experienced increasing trend while Denmark and Sweden showed declination in the sales of fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 334, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s euros in 2004. Likewise, Denmark which was in third position for the sales of b...
^^
Line 5, column 398, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...for the sales of bananas in 1999 dropped to the last position in 2004. Overall...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, second, so, third, whereas, while, in contrast, in contrast to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1047.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10731707317 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0837988887 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.482926829268 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 297.0 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.1539916345 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.333333333 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7777777778 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.44444444444 5.23603664747 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206023007192 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109614995352 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0620302526508 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157984037285 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0556847999875 0.0819641961636 68% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.