The two tables compare the sales of coffee and bananas in five distinct countries in Europe in the years 1999 and 2004. Overall, the United Kingdom and Switzerland, by far, shared the highest levels.
To be more specific, commencing at the third highest position in the sales of coffee in 1999, at 1.5 million euros, the UK’s revenue had exceeded the figure of Switzerland and Denmark, booming over 10 times to 20 million euros, ranking the first. In contrast, except the twofold surge of Switzerland’s sales from 3 to 6 million euros, all the others had experienced minor improvements, stayed below 3 million euros.
Regarding the bananas turnover, most notable of all the figures was the significant increase in the sales of the UK, from 15 million euros to 47 million euros after five years, hence the highest position maintained. Following that was the figure of Switzerland, with a growth of, by a great amount, higher than all the others, which were all less than 6 million euros in both years.
- The plans below show the layout of a university's sports centre now, and how it will look after redevelopment.Summarise the Information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons whee relevant. 96
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 95
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries. Summarise the information 73
- The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods. 73
- The plans below show the layout of a university's sports centre now, and how it will look after redevelopment.Summarise the Information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons whee relevant. 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, if, regarding, third, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 850.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97076023392 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75013018461 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584795321637 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 244.8 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.9280735275 43.030603864 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.666666667 112.824112599 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5 22.9334400587 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.83333333333 5.23603664747 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127223527384 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0782520993588 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0989188131178 0.0843802449381 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108379711136 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0758139495086 0.0819641961636 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.