The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 to 2004 in five European countries

Essay topics:

The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 to 2004 in five European countries

The tables given reveal some stricking changes in selling coffee and bananas which produced by farmers in developing countries in five different Europe countries over a six-year period from 1999 to the year 2004.
A closer look at the tables, coffee was the product that increased in all countries, while, bananas were fall in Swenden and Denmark after 6 years.
It can be seen that, coffee was consumed more and more in Europe. United Kingdom was the countries where had the most dramatic change in sales, there was a considerable development in the sales of coffee ( from 1.5 millions to 20 millions in 2004). Follow by Switzerland, the figure was increased twofold from 3 millions in 1999 to 6 millions in 2004. In addition to this, three other countries, namely Denmark, Belgium and Sweden also has a growth in selling coffee although they were not a huge changes.
In the second table, Switzerland's sales of bananas was higher than four other countries, which increased more than threefold (from 15 millions in 1999 to 47 millions in 2004). UK and Belgium had a considerably changes in sales too, the UK's figure grew from 1 million to 5.5 millions after 6 years, while Belgium's rose from just 0.6 millions to 4 millions. However, in two countries Sweden and Denmark, the sales of Fairtrade-labelled bananas was decline ( 1.8 millions to 1 million in Sweden and 2 millions to 0.9 millions in Denmark).

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2018-08-17 April1804 61 view
Essays by user April1804 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 203, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rable development in the sales of coffee from 1.5 millions to 20 millions in 2004...
^^
Line 3, column 495, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'change'?
Suggestion: change
...ng coffee although they were not a huge changes. In the second table, Switzerlands sa...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 452, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f Fairtrade-labelled bananas was decline 1.8 millions to 1 million in Sweden and ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, second, so, while, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1164.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 239.0 196.424390244 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87029288703 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71878324931 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52719665272 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 327.6 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4650909644 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.333333333 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5555555556 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11111111111 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200919921588 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0929734176915 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0632275785986 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136869121498 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0628096432376 0.0819641961636 77% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.