The tables below give information about the sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.
The tables illustrate the sales of fair trade of two kinds of goods namely labeled coffee and bananas in the European countries during a period of 5 years between 1999 and 2004.
Overall, as can be seen from the chart that the figure for sales of the two products generally increased significantly except for sales of bananas in Sweden and Denmark. Units are measured in millions of euros.
In terms of the sales of labeled coffee, the figure for Britain only stood at 1.5 million euros; however, it surged sharply to 20 million euros, 14 million euros more than that of Switzerland in 2004. Sales of coffee in Denmark contributed only 1.8 million euros, followed by 1 million euros of fair trade coffee products’ sales in Belgium, then the former increased only 0.2 million euros while the latter experienced a rise of 0.7 million euros. Finally, sales in Sweden was merely around 1 million euros during the time shown.
Meanwhile, sales of fair trade of bananas in Switzerland increased by 32 million euros over the period. The figure for the UK and Belgium rose slowly to just 5.5 and 4 million euros respectively in 2004. However, sales for packaged bananas witnessed a small fall from 1.8 million euros to just 1 million euros, followed by a 1.1 million euros decline for that of Denmark.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-08 | huathibichngoc.c3.ltt@gmail.com | 73 | view |
- The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999. 67
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 66
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.Why is this the case?What can be done about this problem? 73
- The process shows how plants create food 82
- The charts illustrate the number of people who were affected by fore types of noise pollution in day and night in cities and rural areas in 2007. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, then, while, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1086.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 224.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84821428571 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50865847555 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486607142857 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 325.8 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.6365175703 43.030603864 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.666666667 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8888888889 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.55555555556 5.23603664747 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156454969035 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0841913908971 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0819864299599 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137640458517 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0962576619585 0.0819641961636 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.