The tables illustrate the sales of two kinds of goods namely coffee and bananas which were labeled Fairtrade in the European countries during a period of 5 years between 1999 and 2004. The Fairtrade labels indicate that products are manufactured from farmers in developing countries which they are paid a fair price.
Overall, as can be seen from the chart that the figure for sales of the two products generally increased significantly except for sales of bananas in Sweden and Denmark. Units are measured in millions of euros.
In terms of the sales of labeled coffee, the figure for Britain only stood at 1.5 million euros; however, it saw a remarkable improvement of 18.5 million euros, 14 million euros more than that of Switzerland in 2004. Sales of coffee in Denmark contributed only 1.8 million euros, followed by 1 million euros of fair trade coffee products’ sales in Belgium, then the former increased only 0.2 million euros while the latter experienced a rise of 0.7 million euros. Finally, sales in Sweden was merely around 1 million euros during the time shown.
Meanwhile, sales of fair trade of bananas in Switzerland increased by 32 million euros over the period. The figure for the UK and Belgium rose slowly to just 5.5 and 4 million euros respectively in 2004. On the contrary, sales for bananas in Sweden witnessed a small fall of 0.8 million euros, followed by a 1.1 million euros decline for that of Denmark.
- Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by governments rather than private companies. Do you agree or disagree? 84
- Some people think that newly built houses should follow the style of the old houses in the local areas, while others think that people should have the freedom to build houses of their own styles. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 73
- The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999. 67
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their wast 84
- The charts below show the results of a survey conducted by a university library to find out the opinions of full time and part time students about its services 72
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, then, while, except for, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1204.0 965.302439024 125% => OK
No of words: 244.0 196.424390244 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93442622951 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61012489134 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504098360656 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 364.5 283.868780488 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.2604276838 43.030603864 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.4 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.7 5.23603664747 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1839022702 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0883910079226 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0890148342476 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136179162496 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0873128675381 0.0819641961636 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.