The tables below give information about the world population and distribution in 1950 and 2000 with an estimate of the situation in 2050 Summarise the information

The tabular chart depicts the information about the world population and contribution by region in 1950 and 2000 with the prediction of year 2050.
Overall, it is clearly seen that the maximum distribution of world population by asia whereas minimum by oceania in the given over the period.
To begin with, the world population was 2.5 billions in1950, and it was increased by 6.0 billions in 2000 but it will be approximately 9.0 billions in 2050. Moreover, the distribution of world population by region was 9% in africa. it can be seen that by 13% while it will be estimate 20% distribution of world population in africa
Apart from this, in asia the percentage was just under 60% in 1950 and 2000 while it will be assumed that 59% of the distribution of world population in 2050. In oceania the distrubution of world population was same by 1% in every year but in latin america, the percentage was 6% in 1950.

Votes
Average: 7.6 (9 votes)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... an estimate of the situation in 2050. Overall, it is clearly seen that the max...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...m by oceania in the given time period. To begin with, the world population was ...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, moreover, whereas, while, apart from, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 3.97073170732 378% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 744.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 159.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67924528302 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76444965151 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 74.0 106.607317073 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.465408805031 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 218.7 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.1214439191 43.030603864 182% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.8 112.824112599 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.8 22.9334400587 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2 5.23603664747 214% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.377894310237 0.215688989381 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.240937954994 0.103423049105 233% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.189079693534 0.0843802449381 224% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.281630496497 0.15604864568 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.191588528099 0.0819641961636 234% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.93 61.2550243902 93% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.46 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.