The linegraph illustrates the rate of mature people who take part in four activities when they had their spare time in the city and the countryside between 1990 and 2010.
What stands out from the graph is that reading was most favorite by both people in urban and rural areas. Following that was playing and the other two remaining activities.
First of all, starting at 71% in 1990, reading was the activity that many people chose to do when they had their free time, much higher than those in city 10%.
From 1990 to 2010, there was a significant rise in the percentage of reading activity in urban areas to 78% and it was also the trend for reading activity in rural areas. Whereas, animated play was still unpopular with both residents in the city and the countryside. In 1990, only 10% of people in urban areas knew about animated play, this data was lower than that in rural 8%. 20 years later, while the figures for animated play activity stayed the same in the city, the number of animated play activity in rural areas witnessed a slight decline from 18% to 14%.
With a reference to the other two activities, playing activity in both urban and rural accounted for higher percents in comparison with photography activity. Between 1990 to 2010, playing activity saw a considerable decrease from 21% to 14% in urban areas. Whereas, the percentage of playing activity in rural areas remained unchanged and photography activity experienced an upward trend throughout the period surveyed.
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas of a European country between 1987 and 2007 56
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 84
- The best way to solve the world s environmental problem is to increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compa 67
- Some human activities have negative effects on plant and animal species Some people think it is too late to do anything about this problem while others think effective measures can be taken to improve this situation Discuss both views and give your opinio 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The linegraph illustrates the rate of ma...
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the countryside between 1990 and 2010. What stands out from the graph is that r...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd the other two remaining activities. First of all, starting at 71% in 1990, r...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ssed a slight decline from 18% to 14%. With a reference to the other two activi...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, still, whereas, while, as to, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1243.0 965.302439024 129% => OK
No of words: 256.0 196.424390244 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85546875 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48304492206 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 377.1 283.868780488 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0675780142 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.0 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2727272727 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.72727272727 5.23603664747 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 3.70975609756 297% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0308053439982 0.215688989381 14% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0172076261854 0.103423049105 17% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0165292180799 0.0843802449381 20% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0206659572094 0.15604864568 13% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0146243101366 0.0819641961636 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.