The line graph illustrates how much money American spending on mobile phone, domestic and oversea landline services yearly from 2001 to 2010.
The initial impression from graph is that the amount of money which customers spending on mobile phone and worldwide fixed-line services grew up considerably. In contrast, the figure for domestic landline services witnessed an opposite trend over the period shown.
Starting at about $700, the national services got the highest value, following by worldwide with about $250 and the smallest was the figure for mobile phone at $200 in 2001. However, there was a significant decline to $600 in the amount of money spending on domestic landline services in the year 2003. Meanwhile, the expenditure on cell phone and oversea fixed-line services growth considerably by more than $300.
After climbing from 2001 to 2003, the amount of money Americans spent on mobile phone fixed-line services continued to bounce sharply to more than $700 and hit the highest level in the last year. In addition, the spending on domestic landline services continued to plunge to $400 and reached the second level. Moreover, worldwide fixed-line services remained stable and touched the lowest point at around $300.
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to Scotland who visited four different attractions in Edinburgh.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where revelant. 11
- The most important function of music is that it helps people reduce stress To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 67
- You should spend about 40 minutes on this task More and more people no longer read newspapers or watch TV programs to get news They get news about the world through the internet Is this a positive or negative development You should write at least 250 word 61
- The maps show how the industrial area will change into a housing area in the future 73
- The picture illustrates how a medical centre changed after some developments in 2010 compared to 2008 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, second, while, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1029.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63650149819 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520408163265 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 314.1 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.821268911 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.333333333 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7777777778 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88888888889 5.23603664747 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304963418057 0.215688989381 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.149558831455 0.103423049105 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0893234187901 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.233119324664 0.15604864568 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0636383117973 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.