TASK 1:
The graph below shows the percentage of workers from five different European countries that were absent for a day or more due to illness from 1991 to 2001.
Summarize the information by selecting reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph gives information relating to the percentage of people that were absent from work due to sickness for one or more days from 1991 to 2001.
Overall, the Netherlands had the highest rate of people taking leave from work due to illness in almost all years of the study, while Germany had the lowest rate.
In 1991, around 5% of the workforce from both the Netherlands and France were off from work for a day or more due to sickness. By 1996, the percentage of workers who had taken sick leave had dropped to around 4% in the Netherlands, and just over 3% in France. While this figure stabilised at around 3% over the remaining years in France, the percentage of workers taking sick days in the Netherlands bounced back up to around 5.5% by 2001.
Meanwhile, the percentage of workers taking sick days in Sweden rose from 3% in 1991 to over 4.5% in 2001. Additionally, while the percentage of workers taking sick days in the UK hovered slightly above 2% over the period, the figure for Germany remained at just under 2% over the entire period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-15 | lengan2013 | 84 | view |
- TASK 1 The graph below shows the percentage of workers from five different European countries that were absent for a day or more due to illness from 1991 to 2001 Summarize the information by selecting reporting the main features and make comparisons where 84
- TASK 1 The graph below shows the percentage of workers from five different European countries that were absent for a day or more due to illness from 1991 to 2001 Summarize the information by selecting reporting the main features and make comparisons where 67
- The chart below shows the percentage of the day working adults spent doing different activities in a particular country in 1958 and in 2008 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 872.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.61375661376 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44619603292 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.470899470899 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 27.4114529914 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.571428571 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.714285714286 5.23603664747 14% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286980500652 0.215688989381 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.169501854196 0.103423049105 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127789462349 0.0843802449381 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210517637637 0.15604864568 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.125175650653 0.0819641961636 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.4 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.