task 1: member of parliament
The line graph compares the proportion of women members of parliament in five European nations from 2000 to 2012.
Overall, it is clear that the percentage of female members of parliament increased in all five countries during the research period. Additionally, the UK experienced the most dramatic change over the 12-year period.
The number of female MPs in Germany began at almost 35% in 2000 and then went up gradually to exactly 35% in 2008. The figure for Italy, France, and Belgium were lower at about 26%, 25% and above 15% respectively in 2000. By contrast, the UK accounted for the lowest number with only 4% at the same time. Although the figure for Germany fluctuated, it continued to go up steadily, ending at roughly 35% at the end of the period.
By 2012, there was a sharp rise in the number of women members of parliament in Italy, at nearly 40%, reaching the highest point of the whole line graph while the figure for France stood at 30%, compared with 23% in Belgium. Britain saw a dramatic rise to 23% which was similar to that of Belgium in 2012.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-01-28 | hoangquang | 78 | view |
- In recent years, many small local shops have closed because customers travel to large shopping centres or malls to do their shopping? Is this a positive or negative development? 61
- task 1: the number of marriages 61
- task 1: The graph below gives information about total oil use of 4 main consumers from 2009 to 2030. 67
- More and more people would like to pay more attention to famous people who have achieved huge success in areas such as cinema sports Why do they attract much interest from people Do you think it is good or bad 88
- task 1: The spending on different kinds 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 887.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66842105263 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48086862636 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557894736842 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7319488588 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.5555555556 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1111111111 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.22222222222 5.23603664747 23% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131749835495 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0602362355349 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0876394799967 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11312337352 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0751923720967 0.0819641961636 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.