Task 1: The percentage of people by age group in one country in 2015. Who used mobile/cell phone for four situations.
The bar chart gives information about how frequently people of a nation in different age groups use their phones in 2015. In general, teenagers and the under 30s usually use their phone in all four situations meanwhile the phones of the eldest are least used.
In public transport, the age group from 18 to 29 was seen to use the phones most in 90% while in a street and a restaurant, they just stood at the second position at 80% and over 71% respectively. People from 30 to 49 used their cell phones less than the first group when they were in public transportation, at approximately 80%. There were around 85% of the 30s to 49s using their mobile phones in the street, compared to 79% of those in restaurants.
The percentage of people in the group from 50 to 64 just decreased 10% basics steadily from 50% in the order of public transportation, street and restaurant. The figures for the eldest was the lowest among four sectors: 20% in public transportation, under 10% in the street and 10% for both restaurant and family dinner. Family dinner was the time that people from all different age groups used least.
- The diagram below shows the process of making bread on an industrial scale in shops Summarise the information and reporting the main features and make comparisons where revelant 81
- Task 1 The percentage of people by age group in one country in 2015 Who used mobile cell phone for four situations 72
- The diagram shows how chocolate is produced Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The bar charts illustrate the average house expenses in England and its capital city London and to present the comparison regarding the average house prices between distinct areas of England within the year 2013 73
- It is thought by some that it s better to live in a city while others believe that life is better in the countryside Discuss both views and give your opinion 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 925.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64824120603 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69918952658 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532663316583 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.1704445105 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.625 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.875 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31103524114 0.215688989381 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14180764499 0.103423049105 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0492140632178 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212054817975 0.15604864568 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0495811296037 0.0819641961636 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.99 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.