The graph provides information about fish and some different types of meat are consumed by a European country in 1979 to 2004.
Overall, beef and limb were most popular types of food in 1979, which were taken by a European country however, this trend gradually decreased and became least popular by 2004. Also there was no significant change in consumption of fish.
From the graph, we can see that in 1979 the consumption of beef and lamb were 150 and around 220 grams per person per week respectively. Where this amount decreased by 1980 and reached 175 and around 125 respectively. Then this amount gradually decreased by 2004 and touched almost 100 and 60 respectively.
If we talk about the chicken, which was the average food consumed by the European community and this value was almost 140 but, by 2004 there was dramatically Increased and reached 250 and became most popular food. There was no major changed in consumption of fish. In 1997 fish consumed by the European country was around 60 grams per person per week and after this value was steadily decreased and reached around 40 by 2004
The graph provides…
The graph provides information about fish and some different types of meat are consumed by a European country in 1979 to 2004.
Overall, beef and limb were most popular types of food in 1979, which were taken by a European country however, this trend gradually decreased and became least popular by 2004. Also there was no significant change in consumption of fish.
From the graph, we can see that in 1979 the consumption of beef and lamb were 150 and around 220 grams per person per week respectively. Where this amount decreased by 1980 and reached 175 and around 125 respectively. Then this amount gradually decreased by 2004 and touched almost 100 and 60 respectively.
If we talk about the chicken, which was the average food consumed by the European community and this value was almost 140 but, by 2004 there was dramatically Increased and reached 250 and became most popular food. There was no major changed in consumption of fish. In 1997 fish consumed by the European country was around 60 grams per person per week and after this value was steadily decreased and reached around 40 by 2004
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 145, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'became the least'.
Suggestion: became the least
...ever this trend gradually decreased and became least popular by 2004 Also there was no signi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 125, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...munity and this value was almost 140 but by 2004 there was dramatically Increased...
^^
Line 7, column 392, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... after this value was steadily decreased and reached around 40 by 2004
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 6.8 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 909.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78421052632 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47290581258 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.457894736842 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 190.0 22.4926829268 845% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 909.0 112.824112599 806% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 190.0 22.9334400587 828% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 32.0 5.23603664747 611% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.215688989381 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.103423049105 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.15604864568 0% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 96.1 13.2329268293 726% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -104.45 61.2550243902 -171% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 75.0 10.3012195122 728% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 11.63 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 14.81 8.06136585366 184% => OK
difficult_words: 21.0 40.7170731707 52% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 55.0 11.4329268293 481% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 78.0 10.9970731707 709% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 55.0 11.0658536585 497% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.