The three bar charts show average years of schooling, numbers of scientists and technicians,
and research and development spending in developing and developed countries. Figures are
given for 1980 and 1990.
The column charts illustrate the level of participation in education and science in developing nations and Industrialized countries. The data was collected and grouped in 3 categories: years of study, the proportion of experts and money invested on the research and development
In general, Industrialized countries dominated the years of whole three categories in the research. And the developing nations and the industrialized nations had the similar upward tendency in years of study and proportion of scientists and technicians.
The financial resource allocated for research and development doubly decreased in developing areas from over 50 billion in 1980 to around 25 billion in the next ten years, contrary to a double rose of industrialized nations from 160 billion in 1980 to over 300 billion in 1990.
There was a slight growth in the average years of schooling in both areas, increased from just under 3 years to just over thee years in developing countries, and just under 9 years to just over ten years in Industrialized countries.
The proportion of scientists and technicians in developing nations insignificantly increased by about 8 individuals per 1000 people from 10 persons in 1980 to 18 persons in 1990. While, this rose was much larger in Industrialized countries, which 30 persons higher from 41 persons to about 70 persons each 1000 people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-22 | Spring2019 | 84 | view |
- The graph below shows the differences in wheat exports over three different areas.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 73
- The diagrams below give information on transport and car use in Edmonton.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisonswhere relevant. 78
- alterations and differences in average house prices in five major cities over the period from 1990 to 2002 compared with 1989. 67
- The restoration of old buildings in major cities in the world costs numerous governments' expenditures. This money should be used in new housing and road development. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.You should writ 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1159.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31651376147 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22164686162 2.65546596893 121% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.481651376147 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 328.5 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.241843296 43.030603864 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 165.571428571 112.824112599 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.1428571429 22.9334400587 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.57142857143 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307294365822 0.215688989381 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.149298209376 0.103423049105 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0544797267045 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174133932005 0.15604864568 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0458015807156 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.2 13.2329268293 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.17 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 11.4329268293 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.