The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
These three pie charts describe differences in annual expenses of a certain UK school in three different years: 1981, 1991 and 2001. In the next few paragraphs we are going to discuss how its spending has changed.
The first thing we see is that, in all the three years, staff’s salaries constitute the most of the school’s spending. Teachers’ salaries increased from 40% in 1981 to 50% in 1991 and then went down to 45% in 2001 which was still higher than those of 1981, whereas other workers’ salaries decreased gradually from 28% in 1981 to 22% in 1991 and then fell to its lowest at 2001 with 15%.
Moreover, we can see that this school spent around 15% on resources in 1981 which rose to 20% in 1991 and then in 2001 it fell dramatically to 9%. In contrast, expenses on furniture decreased from 15% in 1981 to 5% in 1991, later in 2001 they increased sharply up to 23% of total spending. Furthermore, it’s clear that this school’s spending on insurance increased to 8% in 2001 although it was 3% in 1991 and 2% in 1981.
All in all, teachers’ salaries comprised the highest share of this UK school’s expenditure in all the three years, while insurance was the lowest.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-11 | wardiati | 11 | view |
| 2019-08-15 | eurus0124 | 84 | view |
| 2019-08-15 | eurus0124 | 61 | view |
| 2019-07-10 | Mostafa Nabil | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-10 | Mostafa Nabil | 73 | view |
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparis 67
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make compa 78
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Some people think that universities should provide graduates with the knowledge and skills needed in the workplace. Others think that the true function of a university should be to give access to knowledge for its own sake, regardless of whether the cours 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, moreover, so, still, then, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 5.60731707317 285% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1012.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77358490566 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88119138464 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547169811321 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.4803534668 43.030603864 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.5 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.75 5.23603664747 186% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21491169525 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110139128821 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0775095225702 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148861723671 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0725753116918 0.0819641961636 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 78.93 61.2550243902 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.