The pie charts illustrate the changes made by certain educational institution in their annual spending in UK during three different years 1981, 1991 and 2001.
Overall, money spent on teacher's salary was dramatically higher than other spending, while spending on insurance was very minimal in all three different years. Additionally, budget for furniture and equipment was decreased in the year 1991.
To begin with, annual spending on teacher's salary was 40% in 1981, which increased further by 10% in 1991, followed by 5% decreased in 2001. The amount allocated for furniture and equipment in the year 1981 was 15%, which was exactly three folds compared to 1991, and it was drastically increased to 23% in 2001.
Furthermore, spending on insurance was continuously increased in all three years started from 2% in 1981, 3% in 1991, and 8% in 2001. Eventually, the same pattern shown in resources, which started from 15% in 1981, increased by 5% in 1991, and further increased in 2001 by 3%. In contrast, proportion of other workers' salaries was reduced in all three years. In 1991, 28% of total expenditure spent on it, which decreased to 22% in 1991, and reduced to 15% in 2001.
- The plans below show the layout of a university s sports centre now and how it will look after redevelopment 67
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and the academic world Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely Discuss both views and give your 84
- Write a letter to your manager about a computer system problem that you have encountered and say Describe the problem How it is affecting your work What needs to be done about it 73
- The chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010 11
- The diagram below shows the stages and equipment used in the cement making process and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 25, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...91 and 2001. Overall, money spent on teachers salary was dramatically higher than oth...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 35, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...1. To begin with, annual spending on teachers salary was 40% in 1981, which increased...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, so, while, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 995.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02525252525 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74560338081 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.484848484848 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.6859590355 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.555555556 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208041525516 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109391774511 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0821113136511 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162410025527 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.092229156044 0.0819641961636 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.