The table reveals the information about different types of families who were living under poverty in Australia in the year 1999.
Overall, the table suggests that households of a single adult and those with children were more likely to be living in poverty than those who were living as a couple with no children.
To begin with, on average, 11% of all households, comprising almost two million people, were living in this position. However, the percentage of those having one parent or a single adult were highest among all the categories, with 21% and 19%, respectively, which was almost double to those couples who have children with them.
Furthermore, older people were less likely to be poor. The trend favoured to elderly people (only 4%) rather than single elderly people (6%). Additionally, the proportion of couples who have no children was only 7%, which was almost similar to a single aged person. It is noticeable that both types of household with children, a higher than average proportion were living in poverty at that time.
- Write a letter to your friend to recommend a book to read that you have read You should include Describe the book How it can help him her Where can he get it from 87
- The diagrams below show the main reasons workers chose to work from home and the hours males and females worked at home for the year 2019 61
- the table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999 78
- The diagrams below show the life cycle of a species of large fish called the salmon.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourists facilities.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 394, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on were living in poverty at that time.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, so, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 872.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01149425287 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57242817372 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.563218390805 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.539633647 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.0 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16992811091 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0887218668467 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120474695581 0.0843802449381 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149386827168 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.137449177605 0.0819641961636 168% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.