The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, a991 and 2001.
The given pie chart graphs illustrate that in three different years 1981, a991 and 2001 witnesses a large discrepancy of yearly expenses in Uk school.
Overall, the percentage of teachers’ salaries accounted for the highest in comparison with the others. Besides, there was a changes in the another figures over the given period.
In 1981, at 40% of expenditure was allocated for teachers’ salaries, which was the highest. Especially, there was a similarity with the proportion of resources e.g books and that of furniture and equipment (15%). Meanwhile, the percentage of the other workers’ salaries stood at 28%, which was the twice higher than two those figures.
The two years later experienced a slightly increase of roughly 6% in the percentage of insurance; nevertheless, there was a dramatic decrease by 15% in the proportion of other workers’ salaries Whereas, those of teachers’ salaries and resources e.g books gradually rose by nearly 10% in 1991, then declined marginally by 5% in 2001. Meanwhile, the rest figure had an upward trend in 1981 and unfortunately followed an opposite trend in 2001.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 128, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a change' or simply 'changes'?
Suggestion: a change; changes
...son with the others. Besides, there was a changes in the another figures over the given p...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 34, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('slightly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('increase') instead of another adjective.
...ures. The two years later experienced a slightly increase of roughly 6% in the percentage of insu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 44, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e two years later experienced a slightly increase of roughly 6% in the percentage...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, nevertheless, so, then, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 960.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36312849162 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16942495063 2.65546596893 119% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569832402235 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 285.3 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 79.367420898 43.030603864 184% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.0 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.375 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136949930739 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0619470775969 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0999663607632 0.0843802449381 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106266143796 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123498050072 0.0819641961636 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.