The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.
The given maps illustrate a substantial discrepancy between prior and recent Island with the innovation of tourist infrastructures.
Overall. It is noticeable that the island witnessed mass modification with more footpaths and vehicle tracks. Besides, the island became jam packed with many kinds of houses and other modern facilities.
Initially, once island was renovated, not only had it been massive land with some tress, but it also had been surrounded by beach and sea. Swimming was emerged outside the beach, at the same time, pier was built to across the sea to sail destination. Sail was used for customers as leisure pursuits.
According to a -state-of-Art Island, the number of accommodation constructed boosted drastically. With regard to leisure activities, restaurant was built along the side of land which an opposition was reception. After converting island to tourism attraction, original trees, beach and sea still retained in order to decorate landscape.
- The graph below shows radio and television audiences through out the day in 1992. 61
- Studies suggested that nowadays children watch much more television than they did in the past and spend less time on active or creative things. What are the reasons? What measures should be taken to encourage children to spend more time on active or creat 61
- The chart below show the percentage of difference in income between men and women from 1978 to 2008 69
- some people think the increasing business and cultural contact between countries bring many positive developments. Others say it causes the loss of national identities. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 84
- the pie chart below show units of electricity production by fuel source in australia and france in 1980 and 2000. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, so, still, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 829.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 150.0 196.424390244 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52666666667 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.49963551158 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04564534304 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.706666666667 0.547539520022 129% => OK
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.1415744422 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 92.1111111111 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6666666667 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164940773583 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0636054180005 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0444370415325 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0994721802131 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0389825774645 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 61.2550243902 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 11.4140731707 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.06136585366 119% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.